Legal Opinion
Dyer v. William S. Bergman & Associates, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1993No. 91-CV-1110, 92-CV-80 and 92-CV-131PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Two of these three consolidated appeals (Nos. 91-CV-1110 and 92-CV-131) are taken from a judgment against appellant Dyer for breach of contract and tortious interference with contractual relations; each party contests various aspects of that judgment. The third appeal (No. 92-CV-80) is taken from an order awarding attorney’s fees to appellee William S. Bergman & Associates, Inc. All three appeals were noted while a “Motion to Reconsider and Vacate Order Granting Re-mittitur” was pending before the trial court. At oral argument on June 17, 1993, we were informed by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Heard v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re Estate of DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dyer v. William S. Bergman & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- District of Columbia v. Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.