Legal Opinion

The Victoria

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 23, 1924No. 8855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating ing the facts as above). The motion must be denied. From the statements in the several claims filed it is clear that the condition that obtained in the steerage was common, and, if these claimants are entitled to recover, other passengers may have equal right, and the court cannot say that, if 43 claimants are entitled to $£5,000, exclusive of costs, the remaining 145 would not be entitled to more than the difference be*331tween $45,000 and $79,821.60, the value of the ship and freight pending.

If the petitioner has a right to limit liability, it is the duty of this court to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shipowners' & Merchants' Tugboat Co. v. Hammond Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  2. The George W. FieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  3. In re New York Harbor Towboat Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1892
  4. The DefenderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The AquitaniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. The AquitaniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
  3. The EastlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  4. Bishop v. St. Joseph-Chicago S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  5. Hebert v. Exxon Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API