Legal Opinion
Hebert v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided October 29, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-582, 86-2342Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS ON RECONSIDERATION OF CLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MENTZ, District Judge.
Before the Court is Exxon Shipping Company’s (Exxon) motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order granting the claimants’ motion for summary judgment, 659 F.Supp. 130 (E.D.La.1987).
Exxon Barge 334 exploded and sank on November 13, 1985 resulting in loss of life, personal injuries, and property damage. Two days later, a barge owned by Hollywood Marine, Inc. (Hollywood Marine) collided with the partially submerged wreckage of Exxon Barge 334. On June 5, 1986, Exxon filed the instant petition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walter Douglas Nunley v. M/v Dauntless Colocotronis, United States of America and Combi Lines v. Point Landing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- The AquitaniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Jung Hyun Sook, Claimants-Appellants v. Great Pacific Shipping Company and Lasco Shipping Company, Complainants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- The PelotasDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1927
- Petition of American MARC, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.