Legal Opinion

Weiner v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 20, 1960No. 339-56PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laramore, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Tbe claim here is for the disability retirement pay of an Army officer. Plaintiff bases bis claim on tbe alleged arbitrary and capricious action of tbe Army Board for the Correction of Military Records in denying plaintiff a reexamination and hearings and tbe resulting eligibility for retirement pay.

The history of plaintiff’s military service, injuries and consequences thereof, are fully set forth in tbe findings of fact and are briefly as follows:

*447Plaintiff entered on active duty as an Infantry Officer in 1941, after four years of training in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Updike v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Suter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Francis G. Brown v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Harper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Frank A. Hutter v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API