In re F.W.S.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Justice.
On appeal F.W.S. asks us to determine whether clear and convincing evidence supports the lower court’s conclusion that F.W.S. is seriously mentally impaired within the meaning of Iowa Code section 229.1(15) (2003), and whether F.W.S. was denied his right to due process and statutory protections at the commitment hearings. Based on the lack of a record from the lower courts, we are unable to decide F.W.S.’s appeal.
F.W.S. is a forty-four-year-old male who has a history of paranoid schizophrenia. He resided in his own apartment, which is part of a complex federally subsidized…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- State v. MudraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. LudwigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- In the Interest of T.V.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
3Cited by51 opinions
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Simon Estes v. Progressive Classic Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- In Re the Marriage of RicklefsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Smith v. Iowa Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Iowa Land Title Ass'n v. Iowa Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.