Legal Opinion

Ex parte Romanes

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application of Petitioner, who was under arrest, for his discharge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtTitus, C. J.

William Romanes was charged, on the 6th of September last, before the Judge of the Third Judicial District of the Territory of Utah, with the willful, deliberate and unprovoked murder of two unoffending men in Dakota. The testimony, which was strongly prima facie, was laid before the Governor of Utah, and by him submitted to the Governor of Dakota. The prisoner was committed to custody here to await the action of the latter Executive, and upon these facts and proceedings the accused presents his petition, denying the legality of his restraint and asking for his discharge.

Upon this question,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor of New York v. MilnSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Holmes v. JennisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. In re ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re TennerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Burton v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Dennison v. ChristianNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Stewart v. LesinUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. BarnettUtah Supreme Court · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API