Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Dayton Bldg. & Loan Ass'n

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1939No. 1494Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Mary Taylor, plaintiff-appellant, has filed her application for rehearing m accordance with the rules of the Court, especially stressing the transaction of April 1, 1929, involving three certificates of that date in the total sum of $48,000.00. Among the statements of counsel is .hat to the effect that running through the court’s consideration there is a reluctance to give the amount of credence to the oral testimony of Mary Taylor and of Carrie Thomas to which it is entitled.

The Court stated on page 6 of its original opinion in reference to the testimony of Mary Taylor,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McFall v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Sharts v. WarnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Watkins v. BreyfogleOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API