McFall v. Wagner
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By GEIGER, J.
This cause is in this court on an appeal *416or. questions of law and fact. Counsel have stipulated that the testimony adduced m the court below may be used as the testimony before this court.
The plaintiff in her amended petition states that the defendant in addition to doing general business as a Building & Loan Association was authorized to receive deposits and on December 4, 1930 she tendered to the agent of the defendant the sum of $6,000.00 to be placed' on deposit In the deposit account, which amount was accepted and a pass book, No. 14546, issued to her; that the agent…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Lurie v. Miami Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
- Pacey v. Miami Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1941
- Taylor v. Dayton Bldg. & Loan Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1939