Legal Opinion

Holyoke v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 30, 1952No. Gen. No. 45,399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Feinberg

Plaintiff appeals from the decree dismissing her complaint for want of equity, in an action for accounting against defendant.

The cause was referred to a master, who heard the evidence and made his findings of fact and recommendations that defendant account to plaintiff for certain securities held by the bank as collateral; that defendant occupied a fiduciary relation and owed a duty to the plaintiff to protect her in her right of subrogation; that plaintiff had not waived any right to subrogation; that plaintiff had no right to an accounting as to certain other securities; and that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Nonnast v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Miles v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Childs v. National Bank of AustinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  3. Holyoke v. CONTINENTAL ILL. NAT. BANK & TRUST CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Gostomske v. SommerfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API