Legal Opinion

In re Nachman

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 5, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Tn Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

BRAWLEY, District Judge.

G. H. Nachman, a member of the firm of Nachman Bros., which firm had been adjudicated as a bankrupt in involuntary proceedings, being under examination as a witness, certain questions were asked him to which the counsel for said witness objected, on the ground that the answers thereto might tend to incriminate the witness. The referee overruled the objection, and upon request of counsel has certified the same to me for settlement, the reference having been adjourned awaiting an opinion on the question submitted.

Upon the part of the creditors it is contended that, under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Mackel v. RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Clyde H. Hale, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Buckeye Powder Co. v. Hazard Powder Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1913
  4. In re NaletskyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1921
  5. Ex Parte MuncyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API