Legal Opinion
Gindes v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 23, 1981No. Nos. 472-73 and 57-76; Nos. 473-73 and 58-76; Nos. 474-73 and 59-76; No. 60-76PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge
These cases are before the court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment. There is no issue of material fact. We hold in defendant’s favor after hearing oral argument.
During his life, Charles I. Kaplan (Charles) participated in numerous business undertakings with others. According to a Stipulation of Facts filed by the present parties, these enterprises were actively engaged in the business of operating and managing, through independent property management firms, apartment house complexes, commercial office buildings, shopping centers, and other rental properties. The principal assets…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Samuel T. Gindes and Joan L. Gindes v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Veneer Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- L. E. Myers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Consolidated Flooring Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.