Legal Opinion

Consolidated Flooring Services v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 17, 1999No. Nos. 94-352T, 95-1TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARGOLIS, Judge.

The parties requested that this Court identify the scope of the term “employment taxes” as used in the Court’s August 21, 1997 opinion in these eases, reported at 38 Fed.Cl. 450 (1997). In that opinion, the Court held that from 1989 through 1992, plaintiff Consolidated Flooring Services was the statutory employer, under 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d)(1), of the installers’ helpers; therefore plaintiff was liable for withholding and paying employment taxes on plaintiffs payments to the helpers. See Consolidated Flooring Serv. v. United States, 38 Fed.Cl. 450, 457-61 (1997). The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Otte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kurio v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  4. E. C. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Armadillo Corporation v. EnnisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. In re Sand Rock Land Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API