Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 12, 2005No. 03-03-00109-CRPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant Michael Scott of capital murder. See Tex. PemCode Ann. § 19.03(a)(2) (West Supp.2004-05). The district court sentenced him to life imprisonment after the jury found that there was not a probability that he would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 37.071, § 2(b)(1) (West Supp.2004-05). 1

Scott brings forward three points of error challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the guilty verdict. In five points of error, he contends the court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  5. Vasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API