Legal Opinion
Indianapolis Water Co. v. Kingan & Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1900No. 18,706PublishedCited by 10 opinions
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
— Complaint by appellee to quiet title. Answer, general denial. Trial by court. Special finding of facts and conclusions of law. Judgment quieting title in appellee. Motion for a new trial overruled. Errors are assigned on the conclusions of law and the refusal of a new trial.
The assignments present but one question, and that arises on these facts: White river runs through Marion county. It is non-navigable, and the title of adjoining proprietors extends to the thread of the stream. Ross v. Faust, 54 Ind. 471, 23 Am. Rep. 655. Between 1829 and 1836 the legislature passed various statutes to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Herrick v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Brookville & Metamora Hydraulic Co. v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- ROSS v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Neitzel v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Consumers Gas Trust Co. v. American Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Meyer v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Illyes v. White River Light & Power Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.