Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Margulis v. Teichman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 5, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Raymond Radican, J.

On this motion by defendant for leave to reargue and renew no showing has been made that the court overlooked any material fact or misapprehended the controlling law (2A Weinstein-Kom-Miller, NY Civ Prac 1f 2221.04). Reargument is not designed to allow counsel to rehash questions already decided, and consequently, the branch of the application to reargue is denied (2A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, ibid.). However, the request for renewal based on new evidence requires more extended comment.

The decedent and his wife executed a joint will which bequeaths the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. In re the Construction of the Will of SalteriniNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  3. Margulis v. TeichmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
  4. In re the Construction of the Will of SearleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KronenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re the Estate of LuposelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API