Legal Opinion

Cross v. Zellerbach

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Hevada.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

These cases have been argued and submitted *636together. The first is an appeal by the defendant Zellerbach, and the second an appeal by the defendant, the Eureka Lake and Yuba Canal Company Consolidated. These defendants and the plaintiff are the real parties to the controversy. On the first appeal of Zellerbach, reported in 55 Cal 431, the appeal came up and was considered on, (1) the complaint filed July 1, 1864, by Sigourney—the present plaintiff’s intestate—which complaint was in the usual form for the foreclosure of a mortgage given to secure the payment of a promissory note for ten…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Whitehead v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Columbia Engineering Co. v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. W. W. Montague & Co. v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API