Legal Opinion

The Tlingit and Haida Indians of Alaska and Harry Douglas, Intervenors v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 19, 1968No. 47900Published

1Opinion of the Court

389 F.2d 778

The TLINGIT AND HAIDA INDIANS OF ALASKA and Harry Douglas et al., Intervenors,

v.

The UNITED STATES.

No. 47900.

United States Court of Claims.

January 19, 1968.

<CR>

Page 781

I. S. Weissbrodt, Washington, D. C., attorney of record, for plaintiffs. Abe W. Weissbrodt and Ruth W. Duhl, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Ralph A. Barney, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., for defendant.

James C. Peacock, Washington, D. C., for intervenors.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, REED, Justice (Ret.) sitting by designation, JONES, Senior Judge, LARAMORE, DURFEE, SKELTON, and…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API