Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Foust

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. 98-260PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

After the appellee personal representative entered into a contract for sale of the estate’s corporate stock, appellant filed suit seeking to enjoin the sale, relying on the corporation’s Buy-Sell Agreement. The district court entered summary judgment declaring the contract for sale valid and unimpeded by *694the Buy-Sell Agreement. We conclude that the appellant provided notice, pursuant to the provisions of the Buy-Sell Agreement, that the company intended to exercise its option to purchase the stock, thus precluding the personal representative from selling the stock to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Madison v. MarlattWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Zitterkopf v. RoussalisWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lincoln v. Wackenhut Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. 40 North Corp. v. MorrellWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Crockett v. LowtherWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. G.C.I., Inc. v. HaughtWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Pack 2000, Inc. v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API