Legal Opinion

Tunnell v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), entered February 9, 1990, as granted those branches of the plaintfFs motion which were to set aside, as against the weight of the evidence, jury verdicts finding her 45% at fault responsible in the happening of the accident and finding that she had failed to establish that she had suffered a serious injury.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

While a jury verdict should not be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Salazar v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Pire v. OteroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. DeGiglio v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Panariello v. BallingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Luftman v. Fashion 21, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Kinney v. LeiboffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Markowitz v. PuleoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API