Markowitz v. Puleo

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated December 20, 1996, which, upon the granting of the plaintiffs motion to set aside so much of the jury’s verdict as was in favor of the defendants on the issue of liability and for judgment as a matter of law, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.

While a jury verdict should not be set aside unless it is not supported by any…