Legal Opinion

State Farmers Mutual Tornado Insurance v. Cantley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— This is a suit brought by plaintiff against the Farmers Bank of Leeton, Missouri, and the finance commissioner in charge of said bank. The purpose of the action is to have certain funds in the hands of the commissioner in charge of the assets of the bank declared' to be entitled to a preference over the claim of general creditors. The court allowed plaintiff’s claim as a preferred one in the sum of $6.16.02, being the amount of a certain draft issued by the cashier of the Farmers Bank of Leeton to plaintiff, together with the further sum of $3.20, being the protest fee and expenses incurred…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Laclede Bank v. SchulerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Roberts v. Austin Corbin & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Florence Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Federal Reserve Bank v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Maguire's Real Estate AgencySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Bank of Republic v. Republic State BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Carson National Bank of Auburn v. American National Bank of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Carson Nat. Bk. v. Am. Nat. Bk.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Fletcher v. CantleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API