Legal Opinion
State v. Elling
Van Wert County Court of Common Pleas
Decided November 3, 1983No. CR83-9-62PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
This matter came on for trial on October 21, 1983, whereupon the plaintiff presented evidence and the defendant made a motion for acquittal for the reason that the state failed to prove that the defendant was previously convicted of a theft offense which the defendant contends is an essential element of the crime.
Defendant, Mark L. Elling, was indicted for violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(1), a theft offense, which was denominated a felony of the fourth degree by virtue of the fact that defendant had “been previously convicted of a theft offense, in Lima, Ohio Municipal Court case number 16926,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. TriptowUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. CulbersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Ryan Hung-Ping Wang v. William Withworth Lincoln Stokes Anthony J. Celebrezze, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.