Legal Opinion

Feinsod v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1993No. 1033 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Senior Judge.

Michael Feinsod appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (the Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying Feinsod benefits pursuant to Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 because he had voluntarily left employment without necessitous and compelling cause. Feinsod argues that this decision of the Board is barred by the doctrine of res judicata due to a previous unappealed referee’s decision on the same application for benefits which found that he was not ineligible under Section 401(d)(1) of the Unemployment…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Salamak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Uniontown Newspapers, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. E. Farag v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. M. Millwright and Rigging, Inc. v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API