Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Caldellis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2016No. 89585-6PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 Noel Caldellis shot into a crowd of people outside a party, killing one. He was charged with first degree murder “[u]nder circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to human life” under RCW 9A.32-.030(l)(b). The jury was given a to-convict instruction modeled on the relevant pattern jury instruction, which itself was modeled on subsection (l)(b). After Caldellis’s trial, the pattern jury committee amended the relevant pattern instruction to require an additional “element” that “the defendant knew of and disregarded the grave risk of death.” Among other things, Caldellis…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In re Pers. Restraint of PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Hill v. Garda CL Nw., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State of Washington v. Bryan Jack Ross CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. In re Pers. Restraint of JamesWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State Of Washington, Res/cross-app. v. Abdoul Aziz Jallow, App/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API