Legal Opinion

State v. Bockman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 21, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

May a motion, filed during the course of a trial and pending an appeal from a prior conviction, praying that the second trial for the same offense be declared a mistrial and the cause continued pending the final determination of the appeal from the first conviction function to preserve a defendant's rights against being twice put in jeopardy for the same offense is the issue to be determined as presented by the State's brief. Appellants have filed no brief.

[1] Roy Bockman and Joe Bockman appeal from a judgment, under date of March 28, 1938, imposing four years' imprisonment upon a conviction…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Fay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  4. State v. LintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Dupree v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State v. MotonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. State v. McKenzieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. LeakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API