Legal Opinion

Sarkar v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 2024No. 1:19-cv-04040Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 3/28/ 2024 JAY SARKAR, Plaintiff, 19-cv-4040 (MKV) -against- OPINION & ORDER GRANTING NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et MOTION TO DISMISS al., Defendants. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Jay Sarkar, who is proceeding pro se, was paid, as an independent contractor, to provide occupational therapy services to public school children for approximately “5 months” in 2005 and 2006 [ECF No. 34 (“SAC” or the “Second Amended Complaint”) ¶ 16]. The Special Commissioner of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API