Legal Opinion
Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2013No. 12-35266PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
The opinion is amended as follows:
708 F.3d at 1106, Column 1, Lines 14-18 Replace <The district judge’s ... highprofile ease.> with <Panels have broad discretion to reassign cases on remand when they feel justice or its appearance requires it. See United States v. Quack, 302 F.3d 1096, 1103— 04 (9th Cir.2002). The district judge has expressed strong and erroneous views on the merits of this high profile case. Without ourselves reaching any determination as to his ability to proceed impartially or impugning his integrity, to preserve the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Friends of the Wild Swan v. Chip WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Jim PenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. ConnaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.