Legal Opinion
Information Leasing Corp. v. Jaskot
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 2003No. Appeal No. C-020272, Trial No. A-0103453PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Information Leasing Corporation (“ILC”) appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of its complaint against defendant-appellee Walter Jaskot, d.b.a. Highbridge Mobil. ILC claimed in its complaint that Jaskot had defaulted under the terms of a contract between ILC, an Ohio corporation wholly owned by Provident Bank, and Jaskot for the rental of an automated teller machine (“ATM”)- The trial court granted Jaskot’s motion to dismiss the complaint, ruling that the agreement’s forum-selection clause was the product of overreaching by ILC, that there was little…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Haller v. Borror Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Kennecorp Mortgage Brokers, Inc. v. Country Club Convalescent Hospital, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wong v. PartyGaming Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Associates in UrologyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Engineering Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- Bohl v. HaukeOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Engineering Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.