Legal Opinion

Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. Dusenbery

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1897No. S. F. No. 343PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. 0. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Nine actions for the foreclosure of certain mechanics’ liens, of which one was by the appellant, were commenced in the superior court, and by the order of the court consolidated and thereafter tried. The plaintiffs in the several actions were materialmen, and claimed liens upon certain buildings of the defendants Dusenbery and Stencel for materials which had been furnished by them to one Green, by whom the building had been constructed under a contract therefor with Dusenbery and Stencel. The defendant Green was a defendant in the several actions, but his default for want of appearance was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. WeinsveigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Duerr v. SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Hanna v. De GarmoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Colver v. W. B. Scarborough Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API