Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1988No. 5A86PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

In his first assignment of error, defendant Hunt contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a change of venue or a special venire. He argues that extensive inflammatory media coverage of the murders, coupled with extensive word-of-mouth publicity, made it impossible for him to receive a fair trial by a Robeson County jury.

N.C.G.S. § 15A-957 provides, in pertinent part:

If, upon motion of the defendant, the court determines that there exists in the county in which the prosecution is pending so great a prejudice against the defendant that he cannot obtain a fair and…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API