Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Blackham

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 2006No. 2108 WDA 2005PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Christy Blackham, appeals pro se from the judgment of sentence entered in the Butler County Court of Common Pleas. We hold that an indigent defendant, charged with a summary offense punishable by imprisonment, is not entitled to counsel where the court predetermines that a sentence of imprisonment is unlikely, and no term of imprisonment is imposed after conviction. Accordingly, we affirm.

¶2 On March 29, 2005, Appellant observed an altercation between D.M., eight years of age, and other children in front of her house. Appellant took D.M. by his arm and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KoniasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Com. v. Wroten, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Commonwealth v. BoniellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Bank of New York Mellon v. Butterline, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Bruzgulis, S. v. Landowners WildlifeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API