Legal Opinion

Burns v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 30, 1909No. 1422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for damages, from city court of Washington' — Judge Hardeman. September 14, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

Where a carrier fails to' deliver the goods at destination, or delivers them in bad order, section 2334 of the Civil Code confers jurisdiction of an action for the resulting damages on the courts of the county where the failure to deliver occurred (i. e. the county of the destination of the shipment), whether the action be ex contractu or ex delicto. If the action proceed ex delicto the carrier does not defeat the jurisdiction by showing that, physically considered, the loss or damage did not occur in the county where the delivery in good order should have been made. The failure to deliver at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Warfield & LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Lytle v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Brooke v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Brooke v. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Carter v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Adair v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Davis v. SeigelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Munson v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API