Davidowitz v. Delta Dental Plan of California, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, District Judge:
This case presents the issue, on apparent first impression, whether ERISA affirmatively mandates assignability of welfare benefit plan payments notwithstanding an express plan term prohibiting assignment. ERISA expressly provides pension plan benefits are non-assignable, but is silent on welfare plan benefits. While Ninth Circuit authority holds ERISA’s silence does not bar assignments, this Court concludes ERISA’s silence cannot be interpreted to affirmatively mandate an absolute right to assign. We reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
Appellant, Delta Dental Plan of California…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1326, Pens. Plan Guide P 23907b George Peterson v. American Life & Health Insurance Company Creative Health Programs Pacific Southwest Association of Small Employer Firms Richard ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State v. CullenHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Chiropractic Nutritional Associates, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue ShieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Carabillo v. Ullico, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union Welfare Fund v. GentnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.