Legal Opinion

Peritz v. Kaye

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 29, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Goldstein, J.

The novel issue raised on this motion is whether a party may be compelled to produce a supplemental medical report, prepared following a review of records and/or test results, which review was held in lieu of a further physical examination, where the physician had previously examined plaintiff and rendered a report, which was disclosed. Under the liberal disclosure to be accorded by the CPLR, the court holds such report to be by an "examining physician” (CPLR 3121 [b]) and, therefore, subject to disclosure.

*225Plaintiff in this personal injury action seeks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Greuling v. BreakeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Pierson v. YourishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Brooks v. HausauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daguaro v. BratkeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API