Legal Opinion
Daguaro v. Bratke
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 27, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*905OPINION OF THE COURT
David Goldstein, J.
This is a motion by defendant to preclude plaintiff from offering at trial the testimony of Dr. Paul Post, upon the ground that counsel failed to comply with court rules with regard to the exchange of medical information (22 NYCRR 208.13).
The action was brought to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident on January 4, 1985. The case was originally noticed for trial in December 1987. After transfer to this court pursuant to CPLR 325 (d), the matter appeared on the Trial Calendar at least seven times before being marked off on April 10,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Greuling v. BreakeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Pierson v. YourishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Moreno v. Greater New York Dental Administrators, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kurth v. Wallkill AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bruckner v. Jaitor Apartments Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1990
- Dehaney v. New York City Transit AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997