Legal Opinion
Smith v. B & O Railroad
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 13, 1980No. Civ. Y-78-26PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Wallace T. Smith and others seek declaratory, injunctive and punitive and compensatory monetary relief against the defendants, The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (hereinafter “B&O”), The Western Maryland Railway Company (hereinafter “Western Maryland”), and United Transportation Union (hereinafter “United”). The plaintiffs allege that the defendants conspired in negotiating and implementing an agreement dated December 4, 1975, in violation of the Washington Jobs Agreement of 1936, the existing collective bargaining agreement, the United Constitution for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Norfolk & Western Railroad v. NemitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Curtis Milstead v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 957Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re ABF Freight System, Inc., Labor Contract LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Goclowski v. Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982