Halbert v. Forney
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
— Rolla and Lynne Halbert and Helen Forney executed an earnest money agreement for the Halberts to purchase Forney’s property. Forney refused to honor the agreement. Conceding that the property description did not comply with the statute of frauds, the Halberts brought a declaratory judgment action to reform and enforce the agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment to Forney. We affirm because the document cannot be reformed to correct what the parties knew was an incomplete legal description, and the agreement lacks other material terms in any event.
Facts
On June 26, 1995, Forney…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Washington Federation of State Employees, Council 28 v. Office of Financial ManagementWashington Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Key Design, Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Lehrer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Lehrer v. Dept. of Social & Health Servs.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.