Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Mell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 23, 1985No. 6891-5-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

The residuary legatees of decedent E. J. Mell appeal from the trial court's distribution of the entire estate to decedent's son Arthur J. Mell. The issue is whether the trial court erred in concluding that the will was unambiguous, that extrinsic evidence of the testator's intent could not therefore be considered, and in decreeing distribution of the entire estate to Arthur J. Mell, leaving nothing for the residuary legatees. We answer in the affirmative and reverse.

Decedent, E. J. Mell, executed a last will and testament on December 12, 1970. At that time he was married to Mary A. Mell. Mary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Ambrose v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In Re the Estate of BergauWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Estate of RiemckeWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Reynolds v. DonohoWashington Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of MellWashington Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API