Manning v. Andy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
Clair Manning has appealed from an order of the trial court dismissing his complaint in trespass for failure to state a cause of action in negligence. The dismissal occurred following preliminary objections by appellees, John Andy and Frank Andy, individually and trading as J & F Rubber Company and Andy’s Tire Service. On appeal the Superior Court sustained the trial court by a per curiam order. We granted allocatur.
The complaint alleged that appellant sustained injuries in an automobile accident caused by Russell E. Walters, who was under the influence of liquor. Appellant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jardine v. Upper Darby Lodge No. 1973Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
3Cited by62 opinions
- Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Fassett v. Delta Kappa EpsilonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Alumni Ass'n v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.