Legal Opinion

Magid v. Beaver

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 4, 1938No. 26270Published

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The present ease, -which involved a suit on a note and in which the defendant set up a defense that the contract was one of suretyship for the debt of her husband, was previously be*872fore this court as reported in Magid v. Beaver, 56 Ga. App. 286 (192 S. E. 532). This court affirmed the judgment of the trial court in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Upon certiorari to the Supreme Court the judgment of this court was reversed, 185 Ga. 669 (196 S. E. 422), the Supreme Court holding that “under the facts it was erroneous to direct the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, in view of the plea of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magid v. BeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Magid v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API