Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2008No. C-080571Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Lynn Roberts appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss and imposing the remaining portion of his five-year prison term. While his direct appeal was pending in this court, Roberts was selected for placement in an Intensive Program Prison (“IPP”) — a 90-day “boot camp” alternative to prison. Roberts completed the program and was released from prison. Thus, he asserts, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to reimpose a term of imprisonment. Because the record does not support Roberts’s contention that he was properly selected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hall China Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Uddin v. Embassy Suites HotelOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. Roberts, C-060756 (9-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API