Legal Opinion

Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Heaton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1893No. 15,316PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.

The appellee filed his complaint against the appellant in the court below, claiming damages alleged to have been received by him while engaged as engineer on one of appellant’s trains, by reason of the derailment of his train, due to a misplaced switch, caused by a defective switch-lock.

The appellant moved the court to require the appellee to make his complaint more specific in three respects, which motion was sustained as to the first two specifications, and overruled as to the third.

A demurrer to the complaint having then been overruled, the appellant answered in general denial.

The cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. SpilkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. PearcyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Board of Commissioners v. LeggettIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fishbaugh v. SpunaugleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Gamble v. HanchettNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SnowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Moerecke v. BryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. TemperlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API