Legal Opinion
Marino Jair Rodriguez, et al. v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 20, 2026No. 4:23-cv-01379Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01379-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 186 10 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s 14 motion for leave to file an amended answer. Dkt. No. 186. The Court GRANTS the motion. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 The parties are familiar with the factual background underlying this dispute, which the 17 Court has detailed in its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cheyenne Desertrain v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.