Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fox v. Fuchs

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 23, 1926No. Gen. No. 30,062Published

1ConcurrenceO’Connor, J.

Mr. Justice Thomson specially concurring: While I concur in the decision of this case, I do not agree with all that is said in the majority opinion. In actions for damages, based on the alleged alienation of the affections of a husband or of a wife, a much stronger case is required to be made out where the defendant is a parent of the spouse whose affections are alleged to have been alienated than is the case where the defendant is á stranger. Cripe v. Cripe, 170 Cal. 91; Hutcheson v. Peck, 5 Johns. (N. Y.) 196; Bennett v. Smith, 21 Barb. (N. Y.) 439; Glass v. Bennett, 89 Tenn. 478; Ickes v.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  3. Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API