Fox v. Fuchs
Appellate Court of Illinois
1ConcurrenceO’Connor, J.
Mr. Justice Thomson specially concurring: While I concur in the decision of this case, I do not agree with all that is said in the majority opinion. In actions for damages, based on the alleged alienation of the affections of a husband or of a wife, a much stronger case is required to be made out where the defendant is a parent of the spouse whose affections are alleged to have been alienated than is the case where the defendant is á stranger. Cripe v. Cripe, 170 Cal. 91; Hutcheson v. Peck, 5 Johns. (N. Y.) 196; Bennett v. Smith, 21 Barb. (N. Y.) 439; Glass v. Bennett, 89 Tenn. 478; Ickes v.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.