Legal Opinion

Anyasulu v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 15, 2024No. 4:24-cv-03114Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HARRIET GENEVIEVE ANYASULU, et Case No. 24-cv-03114-JSW al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 COMPEL ARBITRATION OR TO v. DISMISS ACTION; SETTING CASE 10 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TEMPUR SEALY INTERNATIONAL, 11 INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendants. 12 13 Now before the Court is the Motion to Compel Arbitration, or, in the Alternative, to 14 Dismiss the Complaint (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Tempur Sealy International, Inc., Sealy 15 Ecommerce, LLC, Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC, Sealy Technology LLC, and The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API