Legal Opinion
Parkerson v. Arthur
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided October 22, 2003No. CA 02-1054Published
1Opinion of the Court
125 S.W.3d 825 (2003)
Gail PARKERSON
v.
James ARTHUR, M.D., Allan Gocio, M.D., and Hot Springs Neurosurgery Clinic, P.A.
No. CA 02-1054.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III.
October 22, 2003.
Appellant, pro se.
Friday, Eldredge & Clark L.L.P., by: Jason B. Hendren, Little Rock, for appellees.
OLLY NEAL, Judge.
This is the second time that this medical-negligence action has been before this court. Following remand, the trial court granted appellees' motion for summary judgment on appellant's informed-consent and medical-battery claims. We affirm.
On March 20, 1990, appellees Dr. James Arthur and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Reeder v. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Bushong v. Garman Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Clemmons v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Fortenberry v. FrazierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1843
- Griffin v. First Nat. Bank of CrossettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.