Legal Opinion

People v. Agramonte

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1996PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

These two appeals by the People involve deviations from the statutory requirements that a deliberating jury be sequestered (CPL 310.10) and that alternate jurors "be kept separate and apart from the regular jurors” once deliberations have begun (CPL 270.30). We conclude that these two statutory violations are unpreserved as a matter of law absent timely objection by defendants.'

People v Agramonte

On the evening of March 3, 1990, defendant and three unapprehended accomplices entered the home of Pasqual Rodriguez, an acquaintance of defendant’s, under the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. Yong Yun LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. MolanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API