Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Maxfield
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
There was no error in overruling the motion for a change of venue. Should the notice served upon the opposite party be regarded as a petition, it is fatally defective in not being sworn to. The affidavit filed therewith states the knowledge of the prejudice of the judge of the circuit court came to the company since the- last term of the court, but does not state the date.
The change of venue was sought on the ground of the prejudice of the judge of the court, who had recently been elected. We take judicial notice of the fact the election for circuit judges took place in June, 1873, and, for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fent v. Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. LarmonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Kane v. FoothIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Bartkowski v. Albert Hoefeld, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1922
- Haskins v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884
- Kinzell v. PayneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- American Strawboard Co. v. Chicago & Alton RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898