Legal Opinion
Hayman v. Pennsylvania
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 9, 2009No. Civil Action 08-574PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN P. FULL AM, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2009, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is (A) GRANTED in part as to Hayman’s conviction under the Pa. C.O.A. with execution stayed for 180 days to permit the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to vacate the conviction and re-sentence Hay-man accordingly;…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Com. v. Hawkins, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020