Legal Opinion

Gerstner v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 11, 1964No. 68308; protest 61/15576 (Rochester)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest relates to a religious statue, made of marble, that was imported in May 1960 at the port of Rochester, N.Y. It was classified under the provision in paragraph 232(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, for articles in chief value of marble, not specially provided for, carrying a dutiable assessment at the rate of 21 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims free entry for the merchandise under paragraph 1774 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (91 Treas. Dec. 306, T.D. 54169, 70 Stat. 1066), effective August 6, 1956, which reads as follows:

Alt…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Acme Marble & Granite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API